My Blog List

Our brand of politics without purpose

Nigerian politicians are a peculiar lot.  They care a lot about power, being in power that is. For them, it is a game of the end justifies the means. It doesn’t matter who they are in bed with, it doesn’t matter what the shape or colour of feather of the next bird looks like, once it helps them get a hold over  power, then let’s go there!
For instance, very few of them have remained in one party since Nigeria returned to democratic governance in 1999. As a matter of fact, a large number of our politicians have moved through all the big political parties before they eventually got settled into one.  That is if they will ever settle. Someone may wonder how that is important. I think it is, because political parties are the engines on which democracy run. They should produce the policies and the people who execute those policies. In most sane political environments, ideologies form the basis on which political parties come up with policies, so you are identified with the ideology of the political party, whose flag you fly.
Take the example of the United States. Even those of us who do not stay in the country have a fair idea of what to expect from each of the two major political parties when elected into office. We know their individual dispositions to the welfare of the people who elect them. They are proud about those dispositions and are willing to defend them until the end. Those ideologies have guided the parties for years and everyone who comes into each of these parties must live with and abide by them.
People in mature political systems do not jump from one party to the other like they are changing hats. Sometimes, generations of families stick to the same tradition for years. That is why the Kennedy Family in the US can be said to be a family of Democrats and the Bush family legendary Republicans. This same tradition is prevalent in the United Kingdom, in France, in Germany, in South Africa and even in our neighbouring Ghana.
Although one is wont to attribute the attitude of politicians in the countries listed above to the number of years for which they have practised democracy, it is also true that politicians in these countries have come to see political office as an instrument of service. Political office is not seen as a means of personal enrichment and personal aggrandisement but a way to give back to society. Of course, this does not mean that we do not find occasions where people misuse power but those are exceptions rather than the rule. And when people misuse power, the system deals with them in a way in which they would likely never consider moving near public office again. People in civilised political cultures do not also consider losing as death sentences on their career. They accept defeat with dignity, congratulate the winner, and go back to the drawing board to prepare for the next time or simply move onto something else. It is never a do-or-die matter!
But we are totally extreme of the other side here. Nothing but personal gains, personal interests, personal ego and generational prosperity underpin our politics. It is the reason why politicians jump from one party to the other. So when they lose the power game here, they look for some greener pastures on the other side and quickly jump there. They now embark on a revenge mission, using all weapons in their arsenal to fight the system that brought them up.
The story is sadly not much different even when they win elections. Political office holders behave as if it is all about them. Members of the same cabinet fight one another like there would be no tomorrow. And when that happens, what do we expect from people from different arms of government? It does not matter that a political party controls both the executive and legislative arms of government at the federal level for instance. The relationship between these arms of government is to say the least shameful. I cannot remember one very important thing that these two arms of government have been able to agree on without dragging us all into an extensive public debate which almost always ends nowhere. And it is no speculation to say that most of these misunderstandings are not about the people. They are about the egos of those who are in power, those who see no reason why they should compromise in the interest of the people who elected them. Did we not see a member of the House of Representatives call for the return of the Petroleum Industry Bill to the executive a few months back? His reason was that the lawmakers were scheduled to proceed on break just when the bill was presented and if it was not returned, the executive would make Nigerians think that it was the House that delayed the passage of the bill. That all important bill, like many others, suddenly became the subject of popularity contest among our politicians.
It is the reason that I hope that those who are coming together to form the All Progressives Congress are doing so for altruistic reasons.  It is my hope that unlike the attempt in 2011 which was scuttled by the personal ambitions of the leaders of the two main collaborating parties, this latest attempt would go beyond individuals. More importantly, in spite of the diverse political orientation (or lack of it) that these people may have, let us hope that they find some philosophy, some ideology other than merely grabbing political power by dislodging the ruling party which joins them together. Without that, it all looks to me that the Nigerian politician has still not started!

No comments:

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...